[PEAK] Rules clarification
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Thu Feb 28 10:17:29 EST 2008
At 07:36 AM 2/28/2008 +0200, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
>After poking around the code a bit I see that an appropriate
>implementation of that seems to be:
>
>@when(implies, (object, type))
>def type_implies(s1,s2):
> return implies(s1, (s2,))
The 'object' should be 'istype(tuple)', actually. And of course a
reverse definition (type, tuple) is needed, and two more versions for
classic classes.
More information about the PEAK
mailing list