[PEAK] PEAK Roadmap Update

cheshire at smile.ch cheshire at smile.ch
Thu May 25 12:03:08 EDT 2006

Phillip J. Eby a écrit :

> At 12:26 AM 5/25/2006 +0300, Niki wrote:
>> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>> After that, I'll be starting on a new PEAK-Rules project, whose 
>>> purpose will ultimately be to replace both RuleDispatch and 
>>> PyProtocols, although it won't do so immediately.
>> Any chance for PEAK-Rules to support unregistering of overloads?
> Yes, this is one of the requirements driving the desire for pluggable 
> engines, as some engines will be optimized for dynamic adds/removes, 
> and others will not be.   RuleDispatch's monolithic engine is 
> definitely not optimized for unregistering things.

Thanks for the amazing work.

However, I'd like to know, if there something too in the documentation 
department, and if we can perhaps help with it.

Antoine Boegli

More information about the PEAK mailing list