[PEAK] I Can't Believe It's Not Threads(tm)!

[Bob Ippolito]

On Feb 4, 2004, at 7:48 PM, John Landahl wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:23:23PM -0500, Ty Sarna wrote:
> ...
>> So the question is, should we be calling peak.events butter if it's
>> really margerine?
>
> I thought of this as well when Phillip first started using the name
> Thread; it was confusing initially, but after getting used to it I
> forgot about raising the point.  :)
>
> What about "uThread", to suggest "microthread"?  Or would that also
> suggest/imply the microthread package for Stackless?
> <http://willware.net:8080/uthread.html>

That package won't even work with the current Stackless (which is much 
different), I wouldn't worry too much about it.

-bob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2357 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.eby-sarna.com/pipermail/peak/attachments/20040204/af81b3e3/smime.bin