[PEAK] Patch: Update RuleDispatch for python-2.7
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Mon Aug 2 22:02:10 EDT 2010
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:59:18PM -0400, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 02:35 PM 8/2/2010 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >The maintainers took a look but spotted a non-technical change right off the
> >bat that isn't necessarily a deal-breaker but does mean a huge amount of
> >work and potentially could cause problems.
> >
> >Looks like 0.5.2 relicensed to the Apache Software license v2. That license
> >is incompatible with the GPLv2
>
> Ah, fudge. I could've sworn it was GPL-compatible. It's just this
> sort of licensing issue I was trying to avoid.
>
> That *really* sucks, as I rather prefer Apache. Oh well.
>
> >Would you be willing to change the license back to PSF or ZPL (with
> >versions if possible)?
>
> How about just ZPL 2.1? I'd really like to drop the alternate
> methods of licensing stuff.
>
That would be great! My handy-dandy license page says that ZPL-2.1 would be
compatible with GPLv2 and GPLv3 so that works out fine.
> By the way, I just got done making a BytecodeAssembler 0.6 release
> that has full 2.7 support (no test failures, full forward/back
> emulation), and I've updated PEAK-Rules in SVN to eliminate all the
> spurious doctest failures. (At least, I can't get any more such
> failures across 2 machines and 5 versions of Python.)
Excellent! pypi seems to be down right now but I'll grab the new release as
soon as I can. Did you license 0.6 as ZPL-2.1 by any chance? Or is it
still Apache License?
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.eby-sarna.com/pipermail/peak/attachments/20100802/ab32739f/attachment.bin
More information about the PEAK
mailing list