[PEAK] RulesDispatch/PEAK-Rules

[Rajeev J Sebastian]

Thanks for the updates Philip.

Regards
Rajeev J Sebastian

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> At 09:18 PM 10/6/2008 +0530, Rajeev J Sebastian wrote:
>>
>> I want to have arbitrary conditions on the function arguments, but the
>> http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/RulesReadme page suggests that
>> this is not yet possible in PEAK Rules ...
>
> It's out of date.  Sorry about that.  I've just updated it now from the
> README.txt in SVN.
>
>
>> Is there any listing of the currently available features of PEAK-Rules ?
>
> Not really, but it can now do pretty much anything that RuleDispatch does,
> as long as you don't need PyProtocols support.  It also has extensive
> internal documentation (see the .txt files in the source) and the beginnings
> of some user documentation.
>
>
>> Should I be using RuleDispatch instead ?
>
> Definitely not.  See:
>
> http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/RulesReadme#porting-code-from-ruledispatch
>
>