[PEAK] Rules clarification

Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Thu Feb 28 10:25:07 EST 2008

At 09:44 AM 2/28/2008 +0200, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
>An yet more questions. Is it intended that if any methods get called
>according to @after rules the return value of the original function is

Nope.  That's a bug.  It's now fixed, in SVN r2500.

More information about the PEAK mailing list