[PEAK] Suggestion concerning RuleDispatch
cito at online.de
Mon Apr 23 02:18:42 EDT 2007
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Actually, the breakage was that setup.py listed the wrong version of
> PyProtocols. It's fixed in SVN now; thanks for the report.
My point was actually that RuleDispatch directly imports
peak.util.decorators, e.g. in /RuleDispatch/src/dispatch/functions.py
so shouldn't it explicitly list DecoratorTools in its install_requires?
I understand that it gets DecoratorTools indirectly because PyProtocols
requires them, but wouldn't it be cleaner to state the dependency
explicitly? Then it wouldn't matter so much which version of PyProtocols
you use. And what if you drop the use of DecoratorTools in PyProtocols
some day and somebody installs the current RuleDispatch?
More information about the PEAK