[PEAK] Strange dispatch problem after cvs up

Bob Ippolito bob at redivi.com
Sun Apr 24 22:57:42 EDT 2005


On Apr 24, 2005, at 10:43 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:

> At 10:10 AM 4/24/05 -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
>> On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 03:33 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>> > Anyway, it's fixed now, but we should probably make a move to 
>> Python 2.4 in
>> > the near future in order to get away from this problem.
>>
>> Any chance that 2.3 compatibility could be retained to a 1.0 release?
>
> Sure.  You meant 1.0 alpha, right?  ;)
>
> Interestingly enough, Google is still on Python 2.2, so at least you 
> can say you're more advanced than Google.  :)
>
> Seriously, though, I'm not sure.  Python 2.4 has an additional 
> advantage in having fast set types, although I'm not sure I'm not 
> going to wind up writing my own bitset and run-length-encoded integer 
> sets in C just to get the best possible memory/speed for some 
> operations.  OTOH, maybe those'll be 1.1 enhancements.  I should 
> probably just get to work on docs after the cleanup pass is done and 
> get on with it.
>
> In short, I'll try to stick with 2.3 compatibility for a while, but 
> working with 2.4 regularly for OSAF stuff is really starting to spoil 
> me.  :)

I vote for 2.4.. Anyone who is going to introduce crazy alpha quality 
stuff like dispatch in production should at least be able to choose the 
latest stable version of Python :)

-bob




More information about the PEAK mailing list