[PEAK] Anybody using 'running.IRerunnableCGI'?

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 09:32 PM 10/5/04 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>Now that PEP 333 is stabilizing, I'd like to ditch IRerunnableCGI in favor 
>of an 'IWSGIApplication' interface basd on PEP 333.  In the process, I'll 
>be wanting to refactor all of PEAK's commands and containers that use 
>IRerunnableCGI to use the new interface.
>
>For most of these, I could possibly write an adapter from IWSGIApplication 
>to IRerunnableCGI, and then just deprecate IRerunnableCGI until the next 
>release, but I'd rather not bother with maintaining the backward 
>compatibility if nobody's using it.

Sorry, false alarm.  We're keeping IRerunnableCGI after all.  It turned out 
when I actually got into the code, it made perfect sense to keep 
IRerunnableCGI around for the subsystems (apart from WSGIServer) that used 
it before, as they are fundamentally CGI-based.  So, I just wrote the 
adapter and made everything else use IWSGIApplication.