[PEAK] Type and class adaptation
golux at comcast.net
Fri Nov 19 17:14:01 EST 2004
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 06:21 PM 11/19/04 +0100, Radek Kanovsky wrote:
>> Has anybody some solution or opinion? Did I miss something?
> Not that I can see. It's a good solution, and a very nice use of the
> framework. I'll doubtless be adding something very similar at some
> point. It's also somewhat similar to how class and attribute metadata
> will likely be registered in future versions of PEAK.
This approach reminds me of Mike Fletcher's BasicProperty/BasicTypes
I'm not sure if they would fit in with PEAK, though. Probably
not. I guess they would be an alternative to PEAK in this area.
More information about the PEAK