[TransWarp] Basic Concepts for using XMI/UML/etc

Ulrich Eck ueck at net-labs.de
Fri May 30 04:46:31 EDT 2003

Sorry for duplicate posting,
my mail-system reported a delivery error.

cheers Ulrich

Am Fre, 2003-05-30 um 10.34 schrieb Ulrich Eck:
> Hi Phillip,
> after i implemented a fairly simple stateful workflow i found that this
> is not 
> sufficient for my needs. after some researches, the StateMachines of UML
> would fit the requirements much more.
> the UML-metamodel specifies all elements of a statemachine and i could
> load 
> them via a XMI file.
> the generated peak.metamodel elements do not have any implementation. 
> i wanted to ask how you expect to make use of e.g. uml elements, 
> imported via xmi.
> will you advise somehow the imported elements to give them behaviour
> (on the fly or after you generated code from xmi)?
> or do you expect to "interpret" the information you get from the
> imported
> elements.
> is the current state of the metamodels package usefull for anything
> right
> now that i could play with e.g. implementing the logic for a
> statemachine
> that "executes" the uml-defined information.
> thanks for your infos
> Ulrich Eck

More information about the PEAK mailing list