[TransWarp] Testing Help Needed: URL contexts
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Wed May 7 20:18:19 EDT 2003
I just checked in a replacement for the old URL parsing mechanisms in PEAK,
and I could really use some help with validating that the existing
supported schemes are parsed correctly by the current CVS version of
PEAK. Specifically, I'm looking for suggested additions to the samples
currently in 'peak.naming.tests'.
If you can supply examples of URLs that produce parse failures, incorrect
resulting field values, or incorrect formatting of a parsed URL, please
send them to me via the list, preferably in the form of additions to the
test suite. If you can come up with some additional "name arithmetic"
tests, too, that would be fantastic. I'm really not that good at coming up
with exhaustive examples for test cases, so our current suite for these
things is pretty minimal.
Please don't bother with checking 'http', 'ftp', 'https', and 'file' URLs
right now since we are effectively parsing those using 'urllib2' for
now. All other URL schemes listed in 'peak.ini' are fair game, however.
If you're unsure how a particular URL scheme or bit of naming arithmetic is
supposed to work, feel free to ask here; then I can add my answers to the
docs. :) Thanks.
More information about the PEAK
mailing list