[TransWarp] HowTo TreeBased Storage with RecordManagers / Specialists ??

Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Sat May 11 10:06:27 EDT 2002

At 06:19 PM 5/10/02 +0200, Ulrich Eck wrote:

>This sound's doable to me .. but I still have one open question:
>- Would your solution be the same if i would store data in an RDBMS using
>  tables with muliple fields as key ?? (e.g. 
> packageId,processDefId,activityId)

Why would it be any different?  The ID's you use might differ at certain 
levels, but at the Specialist and Feature layers the interface should stay 
the same.  The difference would be in what ID's the Specialist passed 
through to the DataModel layer, and the implementation of the query at that 

>I really want to build all these Services Storage-independent as fas as 
>thanks for comments .... (p.s. if there is anything i can help you, 
>getting Transwarp
>closer to 0.2 (except testing .. what I'm doing day by day) , please let 
>me know and
>i'll try to spend some time for this if I'm able to)

I'll keep that in mind.  I'm probably going to look over the old tutorials 
this weekend to try and plan the replacements and examples; don't know how 
long it's going to all take or when I'll have time to do it, but I'm at 
least going to try to get started on a plan this weekend.

More information about the PEAK mailing list